Ruth Schofield

26 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Ruth Schofield
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 24
  • Research and Theory 16
  • General Health Professions 182
  • Emergency Medical Services 25
  • Leadership and Management 4
Replace Felicitas A. dela Cruz with:
Felicitas A. dela Cruz United States
Patricia B. Howard United States
Adele Vukic Canada
Sandra Benavides‐Vaello United States
Magdalena P. Koen South Africa
Margaret Dexheimer Pharris United States
Marit Silén Sweden
Olga Paloma‐Castro Spain
BT Basavanthappa India
Laura Andreu‐Pejó Spain
Ruth Schofield relative to Felicitas A. dela Cruz United States Felicitas A. dela Cruz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Felicitas A. dela Cruz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Schofield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Schofield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Schofield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Schofield. The network helps show where Ruth Schofield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Schofield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Schofield Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Schofield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202032
2 201827
3 201025
4 200822
5 200721
6 200520
7 201319
8
Bridging the discharge process.
199819
9 201418
10 201017
11 199915
12 19989
13 20206
14 19986
15 19974
16 20224
17 20224
18 20143
19 20223
20 20232

About Ruth Schofield

Ruth Schofield is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Emergency Medical Services, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Clinical Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (24 citations), Research and Theory (16 citations), General Health Professions (182 citations), Emergency Medical Services (25 citations) and Leadership and Management (4 citations). Ruth Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl Forchuk, Ruta Valaitis, Ruth Martin‐Misener, Elsabeth Jensen, Andrea Chircop, Andrea Baumann, Noori Akhtar‐Danesh, Susan Duncan, Jane Underwood and Cynthia Baker. Their work appears in journals such as Western Journal of Nursing Research, Public Health Nursing, BMC Nursing, Nurse Education Today and Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact