Richard Fordham
Impact in
-
- Bone health and osteoporosis research
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Homelessness and Social Issues
Papers in
- Surgery 8
- Hip and Femur Fractures 3
- Hip disorders and treatments 2
-
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 2
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 2
- Co-authors
- Ed Wilson (4 shared papers)Ibrahim Abubakar (4 shared papers)Lee Shepstone (6 shared papers)Richard Holland (8 shared papers)Ketan Dhatariya (3 shared papers)Max Bachmann (5 shared papers)Tim Stockwell (3 shared papers)Lisa Irvine (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Osteoporosis International (4 papers)BMJ Open (3 papers)Health Technology Assessment (2 papers)Diabetic Medicine (2 papers)Lara D. Veeken (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Richard Fordham
66 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 133
- General Health Professions 143
- Family Practice 10
- Ophthalmology 47
- Epidemiology 174
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Fordham
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Fordham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Fordham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Fordham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Fordham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Fordham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Fordham. The network helps show where Richard Fordham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Fordham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 174 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 115 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 50 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 38 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 34 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 29 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 21 |
About Richard Fordham
Richard Fordham is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (4 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (3 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (3 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (133 citations), General Health Professions (143 citations), Family Practice (10 citations), Ophthalmology (47 citations) and Epidemiology (174 citations). Richard Fordham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ed Wilson, Ibrahim Abubakar, Lee Shepstone, Richard Holland, Ketan Dhatariya, Max Bachmann, Tim Stockwell, Lisa Irvine, Silke Schelenz and Michael W. Peck. Their work appears in journals such as Osteoporosis International, BMJ Open, Health Technology Assessment, Diabetic Medicine and Lara D. Veeken.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.