David Ryder

1.4k citations
35 papers · 1.0k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 8
    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 2

David Ryder

35 papers receiving 958 citations

Peers

David Ryder
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 89
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 143
  • Oncology 199
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
  • Health 40
Replace Judith Hurley with:
Judith Hurley United States
Elisabeth Clare Larsen Denmark
Deborah Fenlon United Kingdom
Leslie G. Walker United Kingdom
Zhanzhan Li China
Robert P. Derhagopian United States
Christoph Hürny Switzerland
Ana Macedo Portugal
E H Johnson United States
Alice Boyce United States
David Ryder relative to Judith Hurley United States Judith Hurley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Judith Hurley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ryder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ryder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ryder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ryder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ryder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ryder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ryder. The network helps show where David Ryder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ryder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ryder Line = papers co-authored together David Ryder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012192
2 2004174
3 2019154
4 200595
5 201148
6 201345
7 200843
8 201642
9 201436
10 201832
11 201815
12 198814
13 198613
14 198812
15
Drug use and drug-related harm: a delicate balance.
200112
16 202212
17 202010
18 199610
19 20089
20 19998

About David Ryder

David Ryder is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Oncology, Social Psychology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (8 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (89 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (143 citations), Oncology (199 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations) and Health (40 citations). David Ryder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Peter Mackereth, Alex Molassiotis, Jennifer Finnegan-John, Emma Ream, Jacqueline Filshie, Alison Richardson, Myra F. Taylor, Richard Fordham, Celia Godfrey and George Patton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Drug and Alcohol Review, Addiction, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care and Acta Oncologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact