Raphael van Riel
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 11
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- Philosophy 11
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 6
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
- War, Ethics, and Justification 2
- Co-authors
- Patrick D. McGorry (3 shared papers)Bruce Singh (2 shared papers)Elizabeth A. McCarthy (1 shared paper)Andrew M. Chanen (1 shared paper)Dean McKenzie (1 shared paper)T Lohmann (1 shared paper)Klaus Busch (1 shared paper)Luca Barlassina (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Raphael van Riel
19 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- History and Philosophy of Science 44
- Psychiatry and Mental health 147
- Philosophy 101
- Clinical Psychology 148
- Biological Psychiatry 10
Countries citing papers authored by Raphael van Riel
This map shows the geographic impact of Raphael van Riel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raphael van Riel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raphael van Riel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raphael van Riel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raphael van Riel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raphael van Riel. The network helps show where Raphael van Riel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Raphael van Riel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 189 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 47 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 |
About Raphael van Riel
Raphael van Riel is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Molecular Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (44 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (147 citations), Philosophy (101 citations), Clinical Psychology (148 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (10 citations). Raphael van Riel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Patrick D. McGorry, Bruce Singh, Elizabeth A. McCarthy, Andrew M. Chanen, Dean McKenzie, T Lohmann, Klaus Busch, Luca Barlassina, Kevin Reuter and David Copolov. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Grazer Philosophische Studien, Biological Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychiatry and International Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.