Daniel Sutherland

21 papers receiving 187 citations

Peers

Daniel Sutherland
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Theoretical Computer Science 14
  • History and Philosophy of Science 50
  • Philosophy 76
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 59
  • General Psychology 5
Replace Gregory Brown with:
Gregory Brown United States
Kathryn Tabb United States
Jonathan Y. Tsou United States
Shane N. Glackin United Kingdom
Michela Summa Germany
Denis McManus United Kingdom
Andrei A. Buckareff United States
Monima Chadha Australia
Geert Keil Germany
Saulo de Freitas Araújo Brazil
Daniel Sutherland relative to Gregory Brown United States Gregory Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.5×
Gregory Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Sutherland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Sutherland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Sutherland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Sutherland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Sutherland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Sutherland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Sutherland. The network helps show where Daniel Sutherland may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Sutherland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Sutherland Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Sutherland links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202146
2 202135
3 200423
4 200420
5 200518
6 200614
7 20239
8 20055
9 20085
10 20175
11 20234
12 20243
13 20243
14 20213
15 20143
16 20242
17 20212
18 20251
19 20251
20 20211

About Daniel Sutherland

Daniel Sutherland is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, having authored 26 papers that have together received 204 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Disability Support Research (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (6 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (5 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (4 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (14 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (50 citations), Philosophy (76 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (59 citations) and General Psychology (5 citations). Daniel Sutherland has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Richards, Chris Oliver, Christopher A. Jones, Andrew Surtees, Catherine Laverty, Richard P. Hastings, Samantha Flynn, James M. Griffin, John Lynham and Corinna F. Grindle. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, The Philosophical Review, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact