Rachel E. Avery

637 citations
11 papers · 327 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Rachel E. Avery

11 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Rachel E. Avery
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 99
  • Clinical Psychology 96
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 54
  • Social Psychology 86
  • Applied Psychology 14
Replace Purificación Checa with:
Purificación Checa Spain
Alyssa S. Meuwissen United States
Nancy Doyle United Kingdom
Johanna Pretsch Germany
Andrea J. Vickery United States
Scott A. Ottaway United States
Elina Weiste Finland
Brad Elphinstone Australia
Goretti Soroa Spain
Rachel E. Avery relative to Purificación Checa Spain Purificación Checa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Purificación Checa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel E. Avery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel E. Avery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel E. Avery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel E. Avery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel E. Avery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel E. Avery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel E. Avery. The network helps show where Rachel E. Avery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Rachel E. Avery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel E. Avery Line = papers co-authored together Rachel E. Avery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201998
2 201678
3 200934
4 201431
5 201322
6 201221
7 201617
8 201512
9 20155
10 20165
11 20154

About Rachel E. Avery

Rachel E. Avery is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (99 citations), Clinical Psychology (96 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (54 citations), Social Psychology (86 citations) and Applied Psychology (14 citations). Rachel E. Avery has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Luke D. Smillie, Jason S. Spendelow, Laura M. Simonds, Harriet R. Tenenbaum, Naomi Winstone, Patrick J. Leman, Mike Startup, Chris Fife‐Schaw, Jan W. de Fockert and Jonathan Passmore. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, European Journal of Personality, Acta Psychologica and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact