Ping Dong

21 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers

Ping Dong
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Marketing 385
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 261
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 25
  • Sociology and Political Science 401
  • Museology 31
Replace YooHee Hwang with:
YooHee Hwang Hong Kong
Biqiang Liu Australia
Kathryn A. Braun-LaTour United States
Maksim Godovykh United States
Tomaž Kolar Slovenia
Joanna Phillips United States
Liubov Skavronskaya Australia
Xander Lub Netherlands
Yajin Wang United States
Steve Oakes United Kingdom
Ping Dong relative to YooHee Hwang Hong Kong YooHee Hwang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.8×
YooHee Hwang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Dong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Dong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Dong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Dong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Dong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Dong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Dong. The network helps show where Ping Dong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Dong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Dong Line = papers co-authored together Ping Dong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012302
2 2011136
3 201378
4 201337
5 201431
6 201926
7 201822
8 201416
9 201315
10 201314
11 202313
12 201711
13 20149
14 20179
15 20168
16 20126
17 20253
18
Partner Or Servant? When Relationship Type Affects Trait Expectations and Evaluations of the Brand
20163
19 20243
20 20183

About Ping Dong

Ping Dong is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Marketing, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (385 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (261 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (25 citations), Sociology and Political Science (401 citations) and Museology (31 citations). Ping Dong has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Noel Yee‐Man Siu, Yim King Penny Wan, Xun Huang, Robert S. Wyer, Junfeng Zhang, Xianchi Dai, Aparna A. Labroo, Zhongqiang Huang, Lisa C. Wan and Spike W. S. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Tourism Management, Journal of Experimental Psychology General, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research and Journal of Consumer Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact