Philippe Protais

2.6k citations
63 papers · 2.3k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Philippe Protais

61 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Philippe Protais
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.4k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 179
  • Biological Psychiatry 66
  • Biochemistry 156
  • Horticulture 19
Replace Miguel Pérez de la Mora with:
Miguel Pérez de la Mora Mexico
F.V. DeFeudis France
Robert A. Lahti United States
B. Živković France
Harold D. Snoddy United States
W. Kehr Germany
L. Charles Murrin United States
Kensuke Kisara Japan
Albert Weissman United States
M. H. Aprison United States
Philippe Protais relative to Miguel Pérez de la Mora Mexico Miguel Pérez de la Mora's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Miguel Pérez de la Mora · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philippe Protais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philippe Protais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philippe Protais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippe Protais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philippe Protais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philippe Protais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philippe Protais. The network helps show where Philippe Protais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philippe Protais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philippe Protais Line = papers co-authored together Philippe Protais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976294
2 1977196
3 1978188
4 1975112
5 1986102
6 200074
7 198374
8 199773
9 198458
10 199548
11 197747
12 200343
13 198842
14 197842
15 200140
16 199937
17 198237
18 199436
19 199835
20 198535

About Philippe Protais

Philippe Protais is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology, Pharmacology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (31 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (22 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (17 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (10 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers) and Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (179 citations), Biological Psychiatry (66 citations), Biochemistry (156 citations) and Horticulture (19 citations). Philippe Protais has collaborated with scholars based in France, Chile and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jean Costentin, J.C. Schwartz, Marie‐Pascale Martres, Abdeslam Chagraoui, Michel Baudry, H Marçais, J.C. Schwartz, Marc Vasse, Diego Cortés and J. Caston. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Neuropharmacology, Psychopharmacology, Journal of Natural Products and Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact