Philip Sidney

1.3k citations
27 papers · 304 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Sidney

17 papers receiving 108 citations

Peers

Philip Sidney
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Classics 48
  • Literature and Literary Theory 134
  • History 80
  • Museology 17
  • Anthropology 36
Replace Richard Strier with:
Richard Strier United States
Louis Montrose United States
David Scott Kastan United Kingdom
Daniel Javitch United States
M. C. Bradbrook United States
Janet Gurkin Altman United States
Heather Dubrow United States
Margaret Aston United Kingdom
Mary Floyd‐Wilson United States
Coppélia Kahn United States
Philip Sidney relative to Richard Strier United States Richard Strier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Richard Strier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Sidney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Sidney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Sidney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Sidney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Sidney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Sidney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Sidney. The network helps show where Philip Sidney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Philip Sidney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Sidney Line = papers co-authored together Philip Sidney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196786
2 196253
3
An apology for poetry, or, The defence of poesy
200241
4 197534
5
Sir Philip Sidney : the major works
200216
6
Astrophel and Stella
197015
7 197112
8
The Sidney Psalter : the psalms of Sir Philip and Mary Sidney
20097
9
Sir Philip Sidney: Selected Prose and Poetry
19837
10
The major works
20126
11
Selected prose and poetry
19694
12
A Concordance to the Poems of Sir Philip Sidney
19753
13 19633
14 19973
15
The Defense of Poesy, Otherwise Known as an Apology for Poetry
20133
16
A Defence of Poesie and Poems
20062
17
A Woorke Concerning the Trewnesse of the Christian religion
20192
18 19902
19
Sir Philip Sidney's defense of poesy
19701
20
The Lady of May
19961

About Philip Sidney

Philip Sidney is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Music, Religious studies and Infectious Diseases, having authored 27 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Musicology and Musical Analysis (1 paper), Literature: history, themes, analysis (1 paper) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (48 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (134 citations), History (80 citations), Museology (17 citations) and Anthropology (36 citations). Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey Shepherd, Joan Rees, Jean Robertson, Katherine Duncan‐Jönes, Alexander Balloch Grosart, Forrest G. Robinson, Albert S. Cook, Andrew Hadfield, Thurston Dart and Thomas Wyatt. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Modern Language Journal, University of Nebraska Press eBooks, The Yearbook of English Studies and Manchester University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact