Joan Rees
Impact in
- Classics top 5%
- Medieval Literature and History
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 4
- Classics 3
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 3
- Byzantine Studies and History 2
- Medieval Literature and History 1
- Co-authors
- Pat Thomson (1 shared paper)Philip Sidney (1 shared paper)Jean E. Robertson (1 shared paper)Jonathan Crewe (1 shared paper)Joan Grundy (2 shared papers)Philip G. Edwards (1 shared paper)G. K. Hunter (1 shared paper)Dante Gabriel Rossetti (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (18 papers)The Review of English Studies (6 papers)Critical Quarterly (1 paper)The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology (1 paper)Bloomsbury Academic eBooks (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Joan Rees
22 papers receiving 94 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Classics 76
- Literature and Literary Theory 116
- History 108
- Museology 20
- Anthropology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Joan Rees
This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Rees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Rees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Rees. The network helps show where Joan Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Joan Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1975 | 46 | |
| 2 | 1966 | 32 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 27 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1966 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1973 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1971 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1971 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1969 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1971 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1974 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1964 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1968 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 3 |
About Joan Rees
Joan Rees is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, General Arts and Humanities, History and Anthropology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (3 papers), Italian Literature and Culture (2 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper) and African history and culture analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (76 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (116 citations), History (108 citations), Museology (20 citations) and Anthropology (40 citations). Frequent co-authors include Pat Thomson, Philip Sidney, Jean E. Robertson, Jonathan Crewe, Joan Grundy, Philip G. Edwards, G. K. Hunter, Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Jaromír Málek and Franco Marenco. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, The Review of English Studies, Critical Quarterly, The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology and Bloomsbury Academic eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.