Joan Rees

733 citations
34 papers · 153 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

    • Renaissance Literature and Culture 3
    • Byzantine Studies and History 2
    • Medieval Literature and History 1
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 2

Joan Rees

22 papers receiving 63 citations

Peers

Joan Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Literature and Literary Theory 72
  • Classics 22
  • History 56
  • Museology 15
  • Anthropology 19
Replace James Kinsley with:
James Kinsley United Kingdom
Alan F. Nagel United States
Lawrence Lipking United States
Diane Parkin-Speer United States
David Fairer United Kingdom
Janel Mueller United States
Clifford Leech United Kingdom
Sears Jayne United States
Antonio Franceschetti United States
Lorna Hutson United Kingdom
Joan Rees relative to James Kinsley United Kingdom James Kinsley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
James Kinsley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Rees. The network helps show where Joan Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Joan Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan Rees Line = papers co-authored together Joan Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197534
2 198312
3 199210
4 197310
5 198210
6 19669
7 19719
8 19907
9 19825
10 19695
11 19714
12 19664
13 19744
14 19834
15 19713
16 19703
17 19843
18 19683
19 20082
20 19702

About Joan Rees

Joan Rees is a scholar working on Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Sociology and Political Science and General Arts and Humanities, having authored 34 papers that have together received 153 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (3 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (3 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Italian Literature and Culture (2 papers), Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis (1 paper), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (72 citations), Classics (22 citations), History (56 citations), Museology (15 citations) and Anthropology (19 citations). Frequent co-authors include Jean Robertson, Philip Sidney, Joan Grundy, Pat Thomson, Jonathan Crewe, P. G. Edwards, Dante Gabriel Rossetti, G. K. Hunter and Jaromír Málek. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, The Review of English Studies, Critical Quarterly, The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology and Bulletin of Hispanic Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact