Modern Language Journal

6.7k papers and 243.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.7k papers published in Modern Language Journal in the last decades have received a total of 243.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Modern Language Journal usually cover Language and Linguistics (2.6k papers), Literature and Literary Theory (1.7k papers) and Linguistics and Language (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (1.5k papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (1.1k papers) and Multilingual Education and Policy (978 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern Language Journal are Donna Reseigh Long, Anselm Strauss, Juliet Corbin, Karen E. Johnson, Robert E. Stake, Elaine K. Horwitz, Rebecca L. Oxford, Stephen Krashen, Robert C. Kleinsasser and Thomas Luckmann.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Modern Language Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Language Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Language Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Modern Language Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Language Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Language Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Language Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025