Daniel Javitch
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Thomas M. Greene (1 shared paper)John Stevens (1 shared paper)Jon R. Snyder (1 shared paper)Α. Owen Aldridge (1 shared paper)Mario J. Valdés (1 shared paper)Christopher Braider (1 shared paper)John O. Ward (1 shared paper)Debora Shuger (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- MLN (5 papers)Comparative Literature (5 papers)Modern Language Quarterly (3 papers)International Journal of the Classical Tradition (1 paper)Renaissance Drama (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Daniel Javitch
27 papers receiving 339 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Classics 273
- History 297
- Literature and Literary Theory 232
- Anthropology 143
- Museology 37
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Javitch
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Javitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Javitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Javitch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Javitch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Javitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Javitch. The network helps show where Daniel Javitch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Javitch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 180 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 101 | |
| 3 | 1979 | 58 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 55 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 40 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 36 | |
| 7 | Comparative literary history as discourse : in honor of Anna Balakian | 1992 | 20 |
| 8 | 1992 | 16 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1972 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1980 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1971 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 17 | The book of the courtier : the Singleton translation : an authoritative text criticism | 2002 | 5 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 4 |
About Daniel Javitch
Daniel Javitch is a scholar working on Classics, History, Literature and Literary Theory, General Arts and Humanities and Museology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (18 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (13 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (7 papers), Italian Literature and Culture (4 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (3 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (273 citations), History (297 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (232 citations), Anthropology (143 citations) and Museology (37 citations). Daniel Javitch has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. Greene, John Stevens, Jon R. Snyder, Α. Owen Aldridge, Mario J. Valdés, Christopher Braider, John O. Ward, Debora Shuger, François Rigolot and Nicholas Cronk. Their work appears in journals such as MLN, Comparative Literature, Modern Language Quarterly, International Journal of the Classical Tradition and Renaissance Drama.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.