Philip James

166 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Philip James's Hit Papers

The bacterial biogeography of British soils 2011 · 715 citations
7150+5+10Years since publication200400600

Peers

Philip James
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
  • Public Administration 209
  • Soil Science 509
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 220
  • Ecology 910
  • Transportation 216
Replace John Handmer with:
John Handmer Australia
Keith W. Hipel Canada
Frans Berkhout United Kingdom
Noelle Eckley United States
Christina Prell United States
Silvio Funtowicz Italy
Warren E. Walker Netherlands
Rodney A. Stewart Australia
Kathleen J. Tierney United States
J.P. van der Sluijs Netherlands
Philip James relative to John Handmer Australia John Handmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
John Handmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip James. The network helps show where Philip James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip James Line = papers co-authored together Philip James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 171 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The bacterial biogeography of British soils
Hit paper breakdown →
2011715
2 2007384
3 2011368
4 2015191
5 1999145
6 2015139
7 2020108
8 201985
9 202082
10 199878
11 200578
12 201871
13 200960
14 202154
15 202054
16 200652
17 200148
18 202043
19 199742
20 201142

About Philip James

Philip James is a scholar working on Public Administration, Strategy and Management, General Health Professions, Building and Construction and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 171 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (24 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (23 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (16 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (12 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (12 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (10 papers), Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (9 papers) and Regulation and Compliance Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (209 citations), Soil Science (509 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (220 citations), Ecology (910 citations) and Transportation (216 citations). Philip James has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Bruce C. Thomson, Robert I. Griffiths, Andrew S. Whiteley, Thomas Bell, Mark Bailey, Ian Cunningham, Alistair Ford, Luke Smith, David Walters and Rajiv Ranjan. Their work appears in journals such as Industrial Law Journal, Personnel Review, Employee Relations, Work Employment and Society and Economic and Industrial Democracy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact