Philip James

173 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Philip James's Hit Papers

The bacterial biogeography of British soils 2011 · 743 citations
7430+5+10Years since publication200400600

Peers

Philip James
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
  • Public Administration 233
  • Soil Science 517
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 224
  • Ecology 913
  • Transportation 227
Replace John Handmer with:
John Handmer Australia
Adam Rose United States
Keith W. Hipel Canada
Silvio Funtowicz Italy
Warren E. Walker Netherlands
Victor Galaz Sweden
Noelle Eckley United States
Christina Prell United States
Kathleen J. Tierney United States
Jerome R. Ravetz United Kingdom
Philip James relative to John Handmer Australia John Handmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
John Handmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip James. The network helps show where Philip James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip James Line = papers co-authored together Philip James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 183 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The bacterial biogeography of British soils
Hit paper breakdown →
2011743
2 2007395
3 2011379
4 2015213
5 1999165
6 2015147
7 2020117
8 202092
9 201990
10 199881
11 200581
12 201879
13 200967
14 202162
15 202056
16 202056
17 200655
18 200151
19 201850
20 201145

About Philip James

Philip James is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Building and Construction, Strategy and Management and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 183 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (28 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (26 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (17 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (13 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (12 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (10 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (9 papers) and Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (233 citations), Soil Science (517 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (224 citations), Ecology (913 citations) and Transportation (227 citations). Philip James has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Bruce C. Thomson, Robert I. Griffiths, Andrew S. Whiteley, Ian Cunningham, Thomas Bell, Mark Bailey, Alistair Ford, Luke Smith, David Walters and Rajiv Ranjan. Their work appears in journals such as Industrial Law Journal, Personnel Review, Work Employment and Society, Employee Relations and IEEE Cloud Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact