Luke Smith

718 citations
16 papers · 530 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Luke Smith

15 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

Luke Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Global and Planetary Change 324
  • Water Science and Technology 165
  • Atmospheric Science 204
  • Transportation 53
  • Geography, Planning and Development 34
Replace Jurjen Wagemaker with:
Jurjen Wagemaker Netherlands
Jens de Bruijn Netherlands
Jens Kersten Germany
Julian Rosser United Kingdom
Muhammed Sit United States
Ralph Kiefl Germany
Ankush Khandelwal United States
Joachim Fohringer Germany
Michael Jackson United Kingdom
Torsten Riedlinger Germany
Luke Smith relative to Jurjen Wagemaker Netherlands Jurjen Wagemaker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Jurjen Wagemaker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Smith. The network helps show where Luke Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luke Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke Smith Line = papers co-authored together Luke Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2015213
2 201391
3 201563
4 202056
5 201424
6 201623
7 202118
8 202011
9 20226
10 20206
11 20166
12 20185
13 20143
14 20143
15 20162
16 20160

About Luke Smith

Luke Smith is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Computational Mechanics, Transportation and Water Science and Technology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Flood Risk Assessment and Management (7 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (5 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (4 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (3 papers), Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis (3 papers), Smart Cities and Technologies (2 papers), Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies (2 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (324 citations), Water Science and Technology (165 citations), Atmospheric Science (204 citations), Transportation (53 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (34 citations). Luke Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Qiuhua Liang, Philip James, Wen Lin, Ronnie Das, Xilin Xia, Paul Quinn, Stuart Barr, Daniel Bell, T. L. Gilbert and Jeremy Morley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hydroinformatics, Urban Water Journal, Sensors, Dialogues in Human Geography and Computers Environment and Urban Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact