Philip Goff
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 20
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 9
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 6
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 5
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 18
- Co-authors
- David Papineau (1 shared paper)Paul Harvey (1 shared paper)Helen Beebee (1 shared paper)Nikk Effingham (1 shared paper)Philip Clayton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Consciousness Studies (5 papers)Consciousness and Cognition (2 papers)Synthese (2 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Ratio (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip Goff
33 papers receiving 443 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- History and Philosophy of Science 167
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 289
- Philosophy 253
- Cognitive Neuroscience 145
- Social Psychology 87
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Goff
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Goff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Goff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Goff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Goff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Goff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Goff. The network helps show where Philip Goff may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Philip Goff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 210 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 5 | Galileo's Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness | 2019 | 27 |
| 6 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 7 | Experiences Don’t Sum | 2011 | 18 |
| 8 | 2023 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 15 | Spinoza on monism | 2012 | 7 |
| 16 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 5 |
About Philip Goff
Philip Goff is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (18 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (6 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (167 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (289 citations), Philosophy (253 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (145 citations) and Social Psychology (87 citations). Philip Goff has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Papineau, Paul Harvey, Helen Beebee, Nikk Effingham and Philip Clayton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consciousness Studies, Consciousness and Cognition, Synthese, Philosophical Studies and Ratio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.