Ned Markosian

1.9k citations
34 papers · 535 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Ned Markosian

33 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Ned Markosian
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • History and Philosophy of Science 223
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 392
  • Philosophy 289
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 90
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
Replace Hud Hudson with:
Hud Hudson United States
Kris McDaniel United States
Ryan Wasserman United States
John Divers United Kingdom
Gonzalo Rodriguez‐Pereyra United Kingdom
D. M. Armstrong Australia
Tuomas E. Tahko Finland
John W. Carroll United States
Douglas Ehring United States
Brian Leftow United States
Ned Markosian relative to Hud Hudson United States Hud Hudson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hud Hudson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ned Markosian

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ned Markosian's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ned Markosian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ned Markosian more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ned Markosian

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ned Markosian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ned Markosian. The network helps show where Ned Markosian may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ned Markosian, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ned Markosian Line = papers co-authored together Ned Markosian links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998116
2 199863
3 199940
4 200440
5 199340
6 200033
7 201026
8 200122
9 199421
10 201020
11 200517
12 199517
13 201516
14 200412
15 20047
16 20205
17 20145
18 20015
19 19924
20 20193

About Ned Markosian

Ned Markosian is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 34 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (223 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (392 citations), Philosophy (289 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (90 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations). Ned Markosian has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John W. Carroll and Peter Ludlow. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Analysis, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Disputatio.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact