Helen Beebee

2.4k citations
52 papers · 788 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Helen Beebee

47 papers receiving 672 citations

Peers

Helen Beebee
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • History and Philosophy of Science 332
  • Philosophy 455
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 401
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 159
  • General Decision Sciences 9
Replace Mark Heller with:
Mark Heller United States
Richard Fumerton United States
Kevin McCain United States
Barry Stroud United States
Daniel Nolan Australia
Ernest Sosa United States
Jonathan L. Kvanvig United States
Gideon Rosen United States
Roy Sorensen United States
Pascal Engel France
Helen Beebee relative to Mark Heller United States Mark Heller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mark Heller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Beebee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Beebee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Beebee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Beebee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Beebee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Beebee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Beebee. The network helps show where Helen Beebee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helen Beebee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Beebee Line = papers co-authored together Helen Beebee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000113
2
Counterfactual Theories of Causation
2001105
3 200591
4 200242
5 201139
6 201734
7 200533
8
Women in Philosophy in the UK: A report by the British Philosophical Association and the Society for Women in Philosophy UK
201126
9
Hume on Causation
200625
10 200124
11 200324
12 200623
13 200622
14 201721
15
Are Psychiatric Kinds "Real"?
201017
16 199716
17 201315
18 200213
19 200311
20 200710

About Helen Beebee

Helen Beebee is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 52 papers that have together received 788 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Free Will and Agency (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (3 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (332 citations), Philosophy (455 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (401 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (159 citations) and General Decision Sciences (9 citations). Helen Beebee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julian Dodd, Peter Menzies, Huw Price, Christopher Hitchcock, David Papineau, Michael Rush, Peter Millican, Daniel Lasserson, Brian H Willis and Stephen Mumford. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, The Philosophical Review, Noûs and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact