Peter Worthy

34 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

Peter Worthy
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Human-Computer Interaction 75
  • Health Informatics 18
  • Computer Science Applications 44
  • Safety Research 34
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 35
Replace Isabel Pedersen with:
Isabel Pedersen Canada
Qiaosi Wang United States
Leigh Clark United Kingdom
Stephan Schlögl Austria
Vagner Figuerêdo de Santana Brazil
Sofia Serholt Sweden
Radhika Garg United States
Jason Tham United States
Natalie Freed United States
Anita Cremers Netherlands
Peter Worthy relative to Isabel Pedersen Canada Isabel Pedersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Isabel Pedersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Worthy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Worthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Worthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Worthy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Worthy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Worthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Worthy. The network helps show where Peter Worthy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Worthy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Worthy Line = papers co-authored together Peter Worthy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201667
2 202262
3 201648
4 202021
5 202216
6 202211
7 202310
8 20229
9 20208
10 20178
11 20168
12 20166
13 20156
14 20226
15 20165
16 20165
17 20165
18 20165
19 20234
20 20184

About Peter Worthy

Peter Worthy is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (15 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (5 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (5 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (4 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (4 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (4 papers) and Music Technology and Sound Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (75 citations), Health Informatics (18 citations), Computer Science Applications (44 citations), Safety Research (34 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (35 citations). Peter Worthy has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ben Matthews, Stephen Viller, Janet Wiles, Kay Colthorpe, S. Alexander Haslam, Jacki Liddle, Alina Bialkowski, Ryan K. L. Ko, Steven Lockey and Phil Long. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Gerontologist, New Ideas in Psychology, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Disability and Rehabilitation and Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact