Avelie Stuart

26 papers receiving 525 citations

Peers

Avelie Stuart
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Communication 50
  • Gender Studies 63
  • Sociology and Political Science 270
  • Human-Computer Interaction 31
Replace Cassie A. Eno with:
Cassie A. Eno United States
Yalda T. Uhls United States
Chin‐Siang Ang Singapore
Courtney Heldreth United States
Ashley Marie Walker United States
Drew P. Cingel United States
Sanaz Talaifar United States
Namkje Koudenburg Netherlands
Sally Quinn United Kingdom
Franki Y. H. Kung United States
Avelie Stuart relative to Cassie A. Eno United States Cassie A. Eno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Cassie A. Eno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Avelie Stuart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Avelie Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Avelie Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Avelie Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Avelie Stuart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Avelie Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Avelie Stuart. The network helps show where Avelie Stuart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Avelie Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Avelie Stuart Line = papers co-authored together Avelie Stuart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019126
2 201161
3 201552
4 201338
5 201829
6 201528
7 202227
8 201823
9 201621
10 202120
11 201719
12 201918
13 202014
14 202113
15 20179
16 20209
17 20228
18 20208
19 20128
20 20224

About Avelie Stuart

Avelie Stuart is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Demography, Human-Computer Interaction and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 28 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (4 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (4 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers) and Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (35 citations), Communication (50 citations), Gender Studies (63 citations), Sociology and Political Science (270 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations). Avelie Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Ngaire Donaghue, Craig McGarty, Emma F. Thomas, Mark Levine, Constantina Badea, Matteo Vergani, Ana‐Maria Bliuc, Arosha K. Bandara, Blaine Price and Bashar Nuseibeh. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Social Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology, British Journal of Health Psychology, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies and Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact