Scott Heath

24 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Scott Heath
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Linguistics and Language 37
  • Human-Computer Interaction 27
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 97
  • Anthropology 41
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 65
Replace Donald W. Mathis with:
Donald W. Mathis United States
Alexia Galati Cyprus
Leonardo Badino Italy
A. O. Dick United States
Martin Martin Indonesia
Ruth Schulz Australia
Lars Konieczny Germany
Francisco Cuéllar Peru
W.A. Ainsworth United Kingdom
Eliot Handelman Canada
Scott Heath relative to Donald W. Mathis United States Donald W. Mathis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Donald W. Mathis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Heath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Heath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Heath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Heath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Heath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Heath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Heath. The network helps show where Scott Heath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Heath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Heath Line = papers co-authored together Scott Heath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201396
2 201860
3 201815
4 201715
5 201214
6 201611
7 201711
8
A navigating rat animat
201010
9
iRat: Intelligent Rat Animat Technology
20109
10 20169
11 20168
12 20158
13 20167
14 20156
15
Spike-time robotics: A rapid response circuit for a robot that seeks temporally varying stimuli
20105
16 20165
17 20165
18 20195
19 20134
20 20023

About Scott Heath

Scott Heath is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (6 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (3 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (37 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (27 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (97 citations), Anthropology (41 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (65 citations). Scott Heath has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Janet Wiles, David Ball, Gordon Wyeth, Michael Milford, Peter Corke, Gautier Durantin, Ola Olsson, Marie Bodén, Kris Rogers and Paul Pounds. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, International Journal of Social Robotics, Artificial Life, Autonomous Robots and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact