Isabel Pedersen

639 citations
61 papers · 435 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Isabel Pedersen

55 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

Isabel Pedersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Human-Computer Interaction 132
  • Health Informatics 16
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 113
  • Museology 18
  • Computer Science Applications 26
Replace Nelson Zagalo with:
Nelson Zagalo Portugal
Annakaisa Kultima Finland
Marie-Monique Schaper Spain
Joo-Wha Hong United States
Jason Tham United States
Shaimaa Lazem Egypt
Emmanuel Fokides Greece
Carina Girvan Ireland
Yohan Hwang South Korea
Stamatina Anastopoulou United Kingdom
Isabel Pedersen relative to Nelson Zagalo Portugal Nelson Zagalo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Nelson Zagalo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Isabel Pedersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Isabel Pedersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isabel Pedersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isabel Pedersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Isabel Pedersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Isabel Pedersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Isabel Pedersen. The network helps show where Isabel Pedersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Isabel Pedersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Isabel Pedersen Line = papers co-authored together Isabel Pedersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201776
2 201845
3 202136
4 202325
5 202122
6 201818
7 200916
8 201515
9 199812
10 202311
11 20188
12 20058
13 20228
14 20137
15 20176
16 20206
17
Fostering Student Digital Literacy Through The Fabric of Digital Life
20216
18 20026
19 20216
20 20145

About Isabel Pedersen

Isabel Pedersen is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Safety Research and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 61 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Augmented Reality Applications (13 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (11 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (8 papers), Digital Games and Media (6 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (6 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (6 papers) and AI in Service Interactions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (132 citations), Health Informatics (16 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (113 citations), Museology (18 citations) and Computer Science Applications (26 citations). Isabel Pedersen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Ann Hill Duin, Nathan Gale, Pejman Mirza-Babaei, Jason Tham, Andrew Iliadis, Tanner Mirrlees, Jennifer Rowsell, Andrea Slane, Tony Liao and Quinn DuPont. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Continuum, Semiotica, Design Principles and Practices An International Journal—Annual Review and AI & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact