Isabel Pedersen

639 citations
53 papers · 356 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Isabel Pedersen

47 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Isabel Pedersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Human-Computer Interaction 105
  • Health Informatics 16
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 81
  • Computer Science Applications 20
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
Replace Ray Lc with:
Ray Lc Hong Kong
Nelson Zagalo Portugal
Jason Tham United States
Valdemar Danry United States
Joo-Wha Hong United States
Emmanuel Fokides Greece
Britta Schulte Germany
Angel Hsing‐Chi Hwang United States
Carina Girvan Ireland
Yohan Hwang South Korea
Isabel Pedersen relative to Ray Lc Hong Kong Ray Lc's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Ray Lc · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Isabel Pedersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Isabel Pedersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isabel Pedersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isabel Pedersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Isabel Pedersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Isabel Pedersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Isabel Pedersen. The network helps show where Isabel Pedersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Isabel Pedersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Isabel Pedersen Line = papers co-authored together Isabel Pedersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201761
2 201839
3 202134
4 202324
5 202122
6 201816
7 200913
8 201512
9 199811
10 202310
11 20188
12 20058
13 20176
14
Fostering Student Digital Literacy Through The Fabric of Digital Life
20216
15 20145
16 20215
17 20025
18 20185
19 20225
20 20224

About Isabel Pedersen

Isabel Pedersen is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Safety Research, having authored 53 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Augmented Reality Applications (12 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (9 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (8 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (8 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (6 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (6 papers), Digital Games and Media (5 papers) and AI in Service Interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (105 citations), Health Informatics (16 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (81 citations), Computer Science Applications (20 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations). Isabel Pedersen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Ann Hill Duin, Pejman Mirza-Babaei, Nathan Gale, Andrew Iliadis, Tanner Mirrlees, Jason Tham, Jennifer Rowsell, Andrea Slane, Quinn DuPont and Barbara Marshall. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Semiotica, Continuum, Technical Communication Quarterly and Computers & composition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact