Peter Smith

6.7k citations
219 papers · 4.5k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Smith

198 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Peter Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.4k
  • Aquatic Science 623
  • Ecology 1.6k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.2k
  • Genetics 1.3k
Replace Peter Whitehead with:
Peter Whitehead Australia
Eva García‐Vázquez Spain
Stefano Mariani United Kingdom
Madhav Gadgil India
Brian Hayden Canada
Rupert Ormond United Kingdom
Michael O’Connell Canada
George F. Turner United Kingdom
William Ewart Gladstone Australia
John M. Emlen United States
Peter Smith relative to Peter Whitehead Australia Peter Whitehead's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Peter Whitehead · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Smith. The network helps show where Peter Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Smith Line = papers co-authored together Peter Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 219 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002441
2 1991161
3 2006158
4 1982129
5 2005115
6 2010112
7 200882
8 199082
9
Effects of the Eden woodchip industry on terrestrial vertebrates with recommendations for management
198075
10 201068
11 198668
12 199763
13 201359
14 198959
15 200558
16 201257
17 199753
18 200752
19 198648
20 200847

About Peter Smith

Peter Smith is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Genetics and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 219 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Identification and Quantification in Food (45 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (40 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (37 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (24 papers), Marine and fisheries research (17 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (17 papers), Art Education and Development (15 papers) and Marine Biology and Ecology Research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.4k citations), Aquatic Science (623 citations), Ecology (1.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations) and Genetics (1.3k citations). Peter Smith has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. M. McVeagh, Lorenz Hauser, G. J. Adcock, Gary R. Carvalho, Alan J. Jamieson, R. I. C. C. Francis, Yasushi Fujio, Dirk Steinke, Çiğdem Kâğıtçıbaşı and Judy Smith. Their work appears in journals such as New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, Marine Biology, Journal of Fish Biology, Studies in Art Education and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact