Peter Simcock

1.2k citations
46 papers · 852 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Simcock

42 papers receiving 778 citations

Peers

Peter Simcock
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 51
  • Marketing 196
  • Ophthalmology 154
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 201
  • Internal Medicine 21
Replace David Chaney with:
David Chaney United Kingdom
Stephanie Cantu United States
Douglas Cameron United Kingdom
Karen Johnson United States
Dan Jacobson Israel
Jonathan Turner United Kingdom
Daniel Czitrom France
Sally Jones United Kingdom
Nancy A. Yovetich United States
Lisete Mónico Portugal
Peter Simcock relative to David Chaney United Kingdom David Chaney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.8×
David Chaney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Simcock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Simcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Simcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Simcock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Simcock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Simcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Simcock. The network helps show where Peter Simcock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Simcock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Simcock Line = papers co-authored together Peter Simcock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009101
2 200884
3 200178
4 200670
5 200668
6 199354
7 200741
8 201637
9 201433
10 199729
11 200024
12 201924
13 200423
14 201920
15 201619
16 200619
17 199414
18 201310
19 19969
20 20179

About Peter Simcock

Peter Simcock is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Demography and Education, having authored 46 papers that have together received 852 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Impairment and Communication (6 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (5 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (5 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers) and Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (51 citations), Marketing (196 citations), Ophthalmology (154 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (201 citations) and Internal Medicine (21 citations). Peter Simcock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lynn Sudbury‐Riley, Walter Wittich, Paul L. McCormack, A B Tullo, Hadi Zambarakji, Jill Manthorpe, Steve Shaw, Michael Smith, Nirmal S. Mann and George Pappas. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, Ageing and Society, Retina, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and Health & Social Care in the Community.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact