John M. Chaplin
Impact in
- Otorhinolaryngology top 2%
- Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Surgery top 10%
- Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
- Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Randall P. Morton (9 shared papers)Peter D. Costantino (4 shared papers)Nicholas P. McIvor (8 shared papers)Joshua B. Bederson (2 shared papers)Matthew E. Wolpoe (2 shared papers)Ian Stewart (2 shared papers)Satish Govindaraj (2 shared papers)Chandranath Sen (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- ANZ Journal of Surgery (6 papers)Head & Neck (4 papers)Journal of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery (1 paper)The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
John M. Chaplin
26 papers receiving 962 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Otorhinolaryngology 158
- Surgery 391
- Dermatology 55
- Oncology 161
- Oral Surgery 41
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Chaplin
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Chaplin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Chaplin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Chaplin. The network helps show where John M. Chaplin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Chaplin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 148 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 107 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 88 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 85 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 84 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 78 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 69 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 59 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 47 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 38 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 38 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 5 |
About John M. Chaplin
John M. Chaplin is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Epidemiology, Otorhinolaryngology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (4 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (3 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (3 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Otolaryngology and Infectious Diseases (2 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (2 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (158 citations), Surgery (391 citations), Dermatology (55 citations), Oncology (161 citations) and Oral Surgery (41 citations). John M. Chaplin has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Randall P. Morton, Peter D. Costantino, Nicholas P. McIvor, Joshua B. Bederson, Matthew E. Wolpoe, Ian Stewart, Satish Govindaraj, Chandranath Sen, Edward McNeil and Wen X. Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as ANZ Journal of Surgery, Head & Neck, Journal of Surgical Oncology, Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery and The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.