Malcolm Armstrong
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments
- Microbiology top 5%
- Actinomycetales infections and treatment
Papers in
-
- Ocular Infections and Treatments 16
-
- Legionella and Acanthamoeba research 2
- Infections and bacterial resistance 1
- Co-authors
- Andrew B. Tullo (9 shared papers)Fiona M. Carley (5 shared papers)Vijay Shanmuganathan (1 shared paper)Arun K. Brahma (5 shared papers)Leon Au (4 shared papers)Catherine Fullwood (2 shared papers)Andrew Walkden (3 shared papers)Shi Zhuan Tan (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Eye (6 papers)Cornea (2 papers)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (2 papers)Journal of Cystic Fibrosis (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPoland
In The Last Decade
Malcolm Armstrong
18 papers receiving 602 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Ophthalmology 483
- Microbiology 16
- Endocrinology 65
- Infectious Diseases 43
- Molecular Medicine 10
Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Armstrong
This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Armstrong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Armstrong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Armstrong. The network helps show where Malcolm Armstrong may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Armstrong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 115 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 95 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 90 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 48 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 11 | The laboratory investigation of infective keratitis. | 1994 | 16 |
| 12 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 18 | Morphological features of Acanthamoeba keratitis as visualized with laser-scanning In Vivo Confocal Microscopy at diagnosis. | 2021 | 1 |
| 19 | 2015 | 0 |
About Malcolm Armstrong
Malcolm Armstrong is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Endocrinology, Microbiology, Surgery and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Infections and Treatments (16 papers), Legionella and Acanthamoeba research (2 papers), Actinomycetales infections and treatment (1 paper), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (1 paper) and Infections and bacterial resistance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (483 citations), Microbiology (16 citations), Endocrinology (65 citations), Infectious Diseases (43 citations) and Molecular Medicine (10 citations). Malcolm Armstrong has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Andrew B. Tullo, Fiona M. Carley, Vijay Shanmuganathan, Arun K. Brahma, Leon Au, Catherine Fullwood, Andrew Walkden, Shi Zhuan Tan, A. Qamruddin and Stephen J. Tuft. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, Cornea, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.