Michael Smith

3.8k citations
101 papers · 2.7k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Smith

97 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Michael Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Ophthalmology 374
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 479
  • Biological Psychiatry 58
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 512
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 161
Replace Lilian S. Murray with:
Lilian S. Murray United Kingdom
Giovanni Lucignani Italy
Chul‐Ho Sohn South Korea
Hajime Kitagaki Japan
Ashok Panigrahy United States
Ross Bullock United States
Toshiaki Taoka Japan
Masafumi Harada Japan
Hiroshi Nishiyama Japan
Jeffrey R. Petrella United States
Michael Smith relative to Lilian S. Murray United Kingdom Lilian S. Murray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Lilian S. Murray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Smith. The network helps show where Michael Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Smith Line = papers co-authored together Michael Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982340
2 1987277
3 1982166
4 2011150
5 2013137
6 2002122
7 2011114
8 1988104
9 201781
10 200476
11 201059
12
Improved delineation of human dopamine receptors using [18F]-N-methylspiroperidol and PET.
198658
13 201857
14 199445
15 200145
16 201243
17 200741
18 198638
19 201236
20 200736

About Michael Smith

Michael Smith is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (10 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (7 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (7 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (7 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (6 papers), Pulsed Power Technology Applications (5 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (374 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (479 citations), Biological Psychiatry (58 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (512 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (161 citations). Michael Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J Dennert, Nancy C. Andreasen, William A. Peters, Yvonne M. Buys, Graham E. Trope, Charles W. Drescher, David Rubenson, Charles G. Jacoby, Alfred P. Wolf and Carroll D. Arnett. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Glaucoma, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science and Eye.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact