Peter Schachte

51 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers

Peter Schachte
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Software 197
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 235
  • Artificial Intelligence 313
  • Hardware and Architecture 51
  • Information Systems 142
Replace Aaron Bohannon with:
Aaron Bohannon United States
Jean-Luc Richier France
Dilian Gurov Sweden
Craig A. Damon United States
C. O'Halloran United Kingdom
Andrei Paskevich France
Oksana Tkachuk United States
Sylvain Conchon France
Christopher Colby United States
Kuat Yessenov United States
Peter Schachte relative to Aaron Bohannon United States Aaron Bohannon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Aaron Bohannon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schachte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schachte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schachte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schachte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schachte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schachte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schachte. The network helps show where Peter Schachte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schachte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schachte Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schachte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199864
2 200945
3 200634
4 199433
5 201222
6 199821
7 201719
8 200719
9 201318
10 201517
11 201317
12 201815
13 201514
14 201613
15 201311
16
ParaAJ: toward reusable and maintainable aspect oriented programs
200910
17 20189
18
QUIP: a protocol for securing content in peer-to-peer publish/subscribe overlay networks
20077
19
20187
20 20067

About Peter Schachte

Peter Schachte is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Software, Computer Networks and Communications and Information Systems, having authored 57 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (25 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (24 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (18 papers), Software Engineering Research (8 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (8 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (7 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (197 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (235 citations), Artificial Intelligence (313 citations), Hardware and Architecture (51 citations) and Information Systems (142 citations). Peter Schachte has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Harald Søndergaard, Peter J. Stuckey, Graeme Gange, Jorge A. Navas, Kim Marriott, Vanessa Teague, Roberto Bagnara, S.C. Douglas, Roberto Amadini and Alexander Jordan. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, Theoretical Computer Science, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, Science of Computer Programming and Software Practice and Experience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact