Kim Marriott

190 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Kim Marriott
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Human-Computer Interaction 1.0k
  • Software 467
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.8k
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 269
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 129
Replace Kellogg S. Booth with:
Kellogg S. Booth Canada
George G. Robertson United States
Helen C. Purchase United Kingdom
Ben Shneiderman United States
Steven M. Drucker United States
Steven P. Reiss United States
James D. Foley United States
Marc H. Brown United States
John Maloney United States
Dan R. Olsen United States
Kim Marriott relative to Kellogg S. Booth Canada Kellogg S. Booth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Kellogg S. Booth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Marriott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Marriott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Marriott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Marriott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Marriott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Marriott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Marriott. The network helps show where Kim Marriott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kim Marriott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Marriott Line = papers co-authored together Kim Marriott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 196 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017157
2 2016138
3 2018133
4 201898
5 199894
6 199893
7 201986
8 201675
9 201873
10 199769
11 200868
12 201564
13 200964
14 200663
15 202063
16 201659
17 199959
18 200056
19 202056
20 202154

About Kim Marriott

Kim Marriott is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 196 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (55 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (37 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (31 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (29 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (25 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (24 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (20 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (1.0k citations), Software (467 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.8k citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (269 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (129 citations). Kim Marriott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tim Dwyer, Harald Søndergaard, Bruce H. Thomas, Peter J. Stuckey, Matthew Butler, Maxime Cordeil, Cagatay Goncu, Leona Holloway, Alan Borning and Michael Wybrow. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, The Journal of Logic Programming, Constraints and ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact