ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems

82.3k citations
1.1k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems

1.1k papers receiving 74.0k citations

Peers

ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Software 18.1k
  • Hardware and Architecture 27.0k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 27.7k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 34.5k
  • Artificial Intelligence 44.4k
Replace Acta Informatica with:
Acta Informatica United States
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology China
ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review United States
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer United States
IBM Systems Journal United States
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation China
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans United States
International Journal of Parallel Programming United States
ACM Transactions on Database Systems United States
ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software United States
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems relative to Acta Informatica United States Acta Informatica's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Acta Informatica · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems more than expected).

Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems.

About ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems

The 1.1k papers published in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems in the last decades have received a total of 82.3k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems usually cover Hardware and Architecture (408 papers), Software (214 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (480 papers), Artificial Intelligence (817 papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (387 papers) specifically the topics of Logic, programming, and type systems (632 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (381 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (371 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (235 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (169 papers), Software Engineering Research (159 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (130 papers) and Security and Verification in Computing (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems are Leslie Lamport, Maurice Herlihy, David Jefferson, David Gelernter, Jeannette M. Wing, Robert E. Shostak, Marshall C. Pease, Thomas Reps, Jeanne Ferrante and E. Allen Emerson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact