Software Practice and Experience

3.6k papers and 42.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in Software Practice and Experience in the last decades have received a total of 42.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Software Practice and Experience usually cover Computer Networks and Communications (1.7k papers), Artificial Intelligence (1.5k papers) and Information Systems (1.4k papers) specifically the topics of Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (825 papers), Software Engineering Research (611 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (478 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Software Practice and Experience are Edward M. Reingold, Rajkumar Buyya, Rodrigo N. Calheiros, César A. F. De Rose, Rajiv Ranjan, Anton Beloglazov, Emden R. Gansner, Stephen C. North, Donald E. Knuth and Niklaus Wirth.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Software Practice and Experience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Software Practice and Experience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Software Practice and Experience.

Countries where authors publish in Software Practice and Experience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Software Practice and Experience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Software Practice and Experience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Software Practice and Experience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025