Theoretical Computer Science

275.9k citations
13.4k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Formal Methods in Verification
    • semigroups and automata theory
    • Advanced Graph Theory Research
    • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
    • Logic, programming, and type systems
    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
    • Algorithms and Data Compression

Papers in

    • semigroups and automata theory 3.2k
    • Formal Methods in Verification 1.8k
    • Advanced Graph Theory Research 1.8k
    • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs 1.6k
    • Logic, programming, and type systems 2.4k
    • Algorithms and Data Compression 1.9k
    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 1.4k

Theoretical Computer Science

12.3k papers receiving 256.9k citations

Peers

Theoretical Computer Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 160.1k
  • Artificial Intelligence 145.2k
  • Software 17.2k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 62.9k
  • Hardware and Architecture 16.0k
Replace Journal of the ACM with:
Journal of the ACM United States
SIAM Journal on Computing United States
Information Processing Letters United States
Journal of Computer and System Sciences United States
Information Sciences China
IEEE Transactions on Computers United States
Mathematics of Computation United States
Journal of the Operational Research Society United Kingdom
Communications of the ACM United States
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control United States
Theoretical Computer Science relative to Journal of the ACM United States Journal of the ACM's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Journal of the ACM · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Theoretical Computer Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theoretical Computer Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theoretical Computer Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theoretical Computer Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Theoretical Computer Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theoretical Computer Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theoretical Computer Science.

About Theoretical Computer Science

The 13.4k papers published in Theoretical Computer Science in the last decades have received a total of 275.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Theoretical Computer Science usually cover Computational Theory and Mathematics (8.7k papers), Artificial Intelligence (6.7k papers), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (548 papers), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (535 papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (3.1k papers) specifically the topics of semigroups and automata theory (3.2k papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (2.4k papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (1.9k papers), Formal Methods in Verification (1.8k papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (1.8k papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (1.6k papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (1.4k papers) and DNA and Biological Computing (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theoretical Computer Science are Jean-Yves Girard, Rajeev Alur, David L. Dill, Leslie Gabriel Valiant, Gordon D. Plotkin, José Meseguer, Dexter C. Kozen, Maurice Nivat, Gilles Brassard and Bruno Courcelle.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact