Peter Scalia

1.3k citations
43 papers · 777 · h-index 15

Impact in

    • Behavioral Health and Interventions
    • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
    • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
    • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications

Papers in

Peter Scalia

41 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers

Peter Scalia
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Applied Psychology 64
  • General Health Professions 246
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Health 37
  • Family Practice 7
Replace Riaz Khan with:
Riaz Khan Switzerland
Nicola McCleary Canada
Stephania T. Miller United States
Christina Cheng Australia
Cathy A. Coyne United States
Julia Menichetti Norway
Lance Brendan Young United States
Kisha Coa United States
Andrea A. Thornton United States
Filipe Prazeres Portugal
Peter Scalia relative to Riaz Khan Switzerland Riaz Khan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Riaz Khan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Scalia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Scalia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Scalia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Scalia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Scalia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Scalia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Scalia. The network helps show where Peter Scalia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Scalia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Scalia Line = papers co-authored together Peter Scalia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020109
2 201895
3 201879
4 202138
5 202133
6 201933
7 202133
8 202126
9 202125
10 201723
11 202121
12 201820
13 202017
14 201716
15 201916
16 202114
17 201914
18 202113
19 201913
20 202113

About Peter Scalia

Peter Scalia is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pharmacology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (14 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (2 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper) and Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (64 citations), General Health Professions (246 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations), Health (37 citations) and Family Practice (7 citations). Peter Scalia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Glyn Elwyn, Marie‐Anne Durand, Danielle Schubbe, Jan A.M. Kremer, Catherine Saunders, Marjan J. Faber, Renata W. Yen, Christopher F. Dowd, Aricca D. Van Citters and Sarah Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, BMJ Open, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, The American Journal of Gastroenterology and Human Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact