Julia Menichetti

45 papers receiving 597 citations

Peers

Julia Menichetti
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Family Practice 16
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
  • General Health Professions 141
  • Clinical Psychology 91
  • Health Informatics 6
Replace Filipe Prazeres with:
Filipe Prazeres Portugal
Sabine Fischbeck Germany
Peter Scalia United States
Laura Block United States
Frances R. Nedjat‐Haiem United States
Charles W. Given United States
Alexandra E. Harper United States
Bjørg Th. Landmark Norway
Susan M. Hannum United States
Lauri A. Linder United States
Julia Menichetti relative to Filipe Prazeres Portugal Filipe Prazeres's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Filipe Prazeres · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Menichetti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Menichetti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Menichetti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Menichetti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Menichetti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Menichetti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Menichetti. The network helps show where Julia Menichetti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Menichetti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Menichetti Line = papers co-authored together Julia Menichetti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201482
2 201644
3 201938
4 202135
5 201632
6 201830
7 201528
8 201725
9 202122
10 202122
11 201722
12 201621
13 202118
14 202317
15 201514
16 202010
17 201610
18
The Value of a Therapeutic Gardening Intervention for Post-Stroke Patients’ Engagement During Rehabilitation: An Exploratory Qualitative Study
201610
19 20239
20 20199

About Julia Menichetti

Julia Menichetti is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Family Practice, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 51 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (10 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (16 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations), General Health Professions (141 citations), Clinical Psychology (91 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Julia Menichetti has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guendalina Graffigna, Elena Vegni, Chiara Libreri, Edoardo Lozza, Lidia Borghi, Serena Barello, Andrea Bonanomi, Pål Gulbrandsen, Gionata Fiorino and Daniela Leone. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, BMJ Open, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Crohn s and Colitis and Current Drug Targets.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact