Anne Willis
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Sei‐Hill Kim (1 shared paper)Mandi L. Pratt‐Chapman (4 shared papers)Rebecca Cowens-Alvarado (2 shared papers)Katherine B. Sharpe (2 shared papers)Kevin Stein (2 shared papers)Kevin Charles Oeffinger (1 shared paper)Sandra L. Wong (1 shared paper)Jennifer K. Bretsch (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Cystic Fibrosis (5 papers)Journal of Cancer Survivorship (2 papers)CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (2 papers)Journal of Health Communication (1 paper)Seminars in Oncology Nursing (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomUganda
In The Last Decade
Anne Willis
16 papers receiving 872 citations
Anne Willis's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Pharmacy 97
- Oncology 287
- Communication 65
- Applied Psychology 23
- Literature and Literary Theory 55
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Willis
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Willis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Willis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Willis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Willis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Willis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Willis. The network helps show where Anne Willis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Willis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 376 |
| 2 | 2007 | 314 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 12 | A good beginning for babies: Guidelines for group care | 1975 | 7 |
| 13 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 15 | Which Is Better for Babies and Toddlers--Centre Care or Family Day Care?. | 1978 | 1 |
| 16 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1 |
About Anne Willis
Anne Willis is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 915 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Infant Health and Development (1 paper), Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (97 citations), Oncology (287 citations), Communication (65 citations), Applied Psychology (23 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (55 citations). Anne Willis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Sei‐Hill Kim, Mandi L. Pratt‐Chapman, Rebecca Cowens-Alvarado, Katherine B. Sharpe, Kevin Stein, Kevin Charles Oeffinger, Sandra L. Wong, Jennifer K. Bretsch, April Barbour and Durado D. Brooks. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, Journal of Cancer Survivorship, CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Journal of Health Communication and Seminars in Oncology Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.