Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

4.3k papers and 60.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.3k papers published in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis in the last decades have received a total of 60.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (3.5k papers), Epidemiology (495 papers) and Molecular Biology (301 papers) specifically the topics of Therapeutic Advances in Cystic Fibrosis Research (3.2k papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (854 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (573 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis are Niels Høiby, Harry Heijerman, J.S. Elborn, Michael W. Konstan, Gerd Döring, Philip M. Farrell, Patrick A. Flume, K. De Boeck, Félix Ratjen and Gregory S. Sawicki.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Cystic Fibrosis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025