Peter R. Lichstein

20 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Peter R. Lichstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Family Practice 32
  • Pharmacology 60
  • General Health Professions 156
  • Pharmacy 30
  • Neurology 75
Replace Hazel Sinclair with:
Hazel Sinclair United Kingdom
Peter J. Helms United Kingdom
Daniela Oliveira de Melo Brazil
Hui-Wen Keri Yang United States
Robert Parker Australia
Kay Miller United States
Fu‐In Tang Taiwan
Pravin Kamble United States
Anne‐Françoise Allaz Switzerland
David A. Pollack United States
Peter R. Lichstein relative to Hazel Sinclair United Kingdom Hazel Sinclair's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hazel Sinclair · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter R. Lichstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter R. Lichstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter R. Lichstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter R. Lichstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter R. Lichstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter R. Lichstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter R. Lichstein. The network helps show where Peter R. Lichstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter R. Lichstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter R. Lichstein Line = papers co-authored together Peter R. Lichstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200495
2 198483
3 198968
4 199265
5 199628
6 201126
7 201817
8 198216
9 201716
10 201414
11 200612
12
The Medical Interview
19908
13 20157
14 20086
15 20074
16 20053
17 19962
18 19852
19 19961
20 19821

About Peter R. Lichstein

Peter R. Lichstein is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health and Neurology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (32 citations), Pharmacology (60 citations), General Health Professions (156 citations), Pharmacy (30 citations) and Neurology (75 citations). Peter R. Lichstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George S. Hughes, James L. Wofford, Marcia M. Wofford, Hal H. Atkinson, Shellie D. Ellis, Denise E. Bonds, Calvin L. Chou, Jill Ohar, Auguste H. Fortin and Richard F. Loeser. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, The American Journal of Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine and Violence Against Women.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact