Countries where authors publish in Violence Against Women
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Violence Against Women. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Violence Against Women with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Violence Against Women more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Violence Against Women
This network shows the impact of papers published in Violence Against Women. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Violence Against Women.
About Violence Against Women
The 2.7k papers published in Violence Against Women in the last decades have received a total of 84.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Violence Against Women usually cover Health (1.8k papers), Gender Studies (1.3k papers), Clinical Psychology (777 papers), Sociology and Political Science (1.5k papers) and General Health Professions (576 papers) specifically the topics of Intimate Partner and Family Violence (1.8k papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (935 papers), Sex work and related issues (579 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (422 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (276 papers), Gender, Security, and Conflict (272 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (259 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (259 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Violence Against Women are Lori Heise, Michael P. Johnson, Murray A. Straus, Jeffrey L.Edleson, Michael S. Kimmel, Richard M. Tolman, Nancy Thoennes, Anita Raj, Lisa A. Goodman and Patricia Tjaden.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.