Matthew Miles

555 citations
29 papers · 252 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Miles

21 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Matthew Miles
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 9
  • Physiology 71
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 70
  • Microbiology 1
Replace Sarah Moody‐Thomas with:
Sarah Moody‐Thomas United States
Paul A. Levy United States
K. Buesch United Kingdom
Andy Heard United Kingdom
Yasmin Khan United States
Uma Padhye Phatak United States
Vicky Ro United States
Ireri Thirión-Romero Mexico
Katherine-Ann Piedalue Canada
Ju Suk Lee South Korea
Matthew Miles relative to Sarah Moody‐Thomas United States Sarah Moody‐Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sarah Moody‐Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Miles. The network helps show where Matthew Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Miles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Miles Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Miles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201059
2 202139
3 201834
4 201628
5 201126
6 201420
7 20128
8 20156
9 20236
10 20125
11 20115
12 20173
13 20183
14 20222
15 20172
16 20181
17 20181
18 20181
19 20161
20 20151

About Matthew Miles

Matthew Miles is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 29 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (8 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (9 citations), Physiology (71 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (70 citations) and Microbiology (1 citation). Matthew Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James F. Donohue, Jill Ohar, W. Graham Carlos, Rosemary Adamson, Alison S. Clay, Reynold A. Panettieri, Deepak A. Deshpande, Rodolfo M. Pascual, Raymond B. Penn and Ellen C. Riemer. Their work appears in journals such as CHEST Journal, Annals of the American Thoracic Society, The FASEB Journal, Drugs and The American Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact