Peter Kosso

32 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

Peter Kosso
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • History and Philosophy of Science 237
  • Archeology 15
  • General Psychology 10
  • Philosophy 87
  • Theoretical Computer Science 8
Replace Merrilee H. Salmon with:
Merrilee H. Salmon United States
Peter Damerow Germany
James A. Secord United Kingdom
Jürgen Renn Germany
Mary Tiles United States
John North United Kingdom
Charles B. Schmitt United Kingdom
William R. Newman United States
Muhammad Ali Khalidi Canada
Jack Morrell United Kingdom
Peter Kosso relative to Merrilee H. Salmon United States Merrilee H. Salmon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Merrilee H. Salmon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kosso

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kosso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kosso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kosso more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kosso

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kosso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kosso. The network helps show where Peter Kosso may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter Kosso, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Kosso Line = papers co-authored together Peter Kosso links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Fact and method
1987100
2 199253
3 198944
4 199139
5 200033
6 198932
7 199531
8
Reading the book of nature
199230
9 198827
10 200226
11 200622
12 201114
13 201311
14 199211
15 200010
16 20089
17 19938
18 20067
19 20007
20 20176

About Peter Kosso

Peter Kosso is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science, Global and Planetary Change, Anthropology and Paleontology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 558 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (10 papers), Science and Climate Studies (6 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (4 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (3 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (237 citations), Archeology (15 citations), General Psychology (10 citations), Philosophy (87 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (8 citations). Peter Kosso has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard W. Miller, Robert J. Deltete, Peter Milne, Alan Musgrave, Donald Gillies, Jeffrey Bub, Paul Teller and Ronald N. Giere. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Foundations of Science, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Science & Education and History and Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact