Peter Kosso

37 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

Peter Kosso
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • History and Philosophy of Science 307
  • Archeology 17
  • Space and Planetary Science 18
  • Philosophy 111
  • General Psychology 12
Replace Paula Findlen with:
Paula Findlen United States
Charles Coulston Gillispie United States
Bernard V. Lightman Canada
Edward C. Moore United Kingdom
Iwan Rhys Morus United Kingdom
Denis Diderot Canada
Arthur O. Lovejoy United States
Nathan Sivin United States
Lynn Thorndike United States
Muhammad Ali Khalidi Canada
Peter Kosso relative to Paula Findlen United States Paula Findlen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Paula Findlen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kosso

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kosso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kosso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kosso more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kosso

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kosso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kosso. The network helps show where Peter Kosso may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter Kosso, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Kosso Line = papers co-authored together Peter Kosso links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Fact and method
1987127
2 199259
3 198953
4 199146
5 199544
6 198941
7 200039
8 198837
9
Reading the book of nature
199234
10 200230
11 200623
12 199218
13 201117
14 201313
15 200013
16 199312
17 200811
18 200610
19 20038
20 20007

About Peter Kosso

Peter Kosso is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Anthropology, Global and Planetary Change and Paleontology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 704 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (11 papers), Science and Climate Studies (6 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (3 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (3 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (307 citations), Archeology (17 citations), Space and Planetary Science (18 citations), Philosophy (111 citations) and General Psychology (12 citations). Peter Kosso has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard W. Miller, Robert J. Deltete, Peter Milne, Donald A. Gillies, Alan E. Musgrave, Jeffrey Bub, Paul Teller and Ronald N. Giere. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Foundations of Science, History and Theory, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science and Science & Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact