Jack Morrell

1.4k citations
52 papers · 777 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Morrell

44 papers receiving 540 citations

Peers

Jack Morrell
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • History and Philosophy of Science 415
  • Theoretical Computer Science 26
  • History 163
  • Anthropology 120
  • General Psychology 11
Replace Richard Yeo with:
Richard Yeo Australia
Crosbie Smith United Kingdom
Geoffrey Cantor United Kingdom
Graeme Gooday United Kingdom
Robert H. Kargon United States
Mikuláš Teich United Kingdom
Iwan Rhys Morus United Kingdom
Peter Dear United States
William R. Newman United States
Brooke Hindle United States
Jack Morrell relative to Richard Yeo Australia Richard Yeo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Richard Yeo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Morrell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Morrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Morrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Morrell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Morrell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Morrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Morrell. The network helps show where Jack Morrell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jack Morrell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Morrell Line = papers co-authored together Jack Morrell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982253
2 1972127
3 198488
4 197153
5 197132
6
Gentlemen of science : early correspondence of the British Association for the Advancement of Science
198423
7 197622
8 199821
9 197116
10 196913
11 197213
12 196912
13 199311
14 197410
15 19738
16 19698
17 19857
18
Wood preservation and wood products treatment : training manual
20067
19 20024
20 20013

About Jack Morrell

Jack Morrell is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, Philosophy, Atmospheric Science and History, having authored 52 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (20 papers), Australian Indigenous Culture and History (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3 papers), Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Medical History and Innovations (2 papers) and Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (415 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (26 citations), History (163 citations), Anthropology (120 citations) and General Psychology (11 citations). Jack Morrell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arnold Thackray, Charles Coulston Gillispie, Ian Inkster, Rudolf Schmid, David C. Miller, Frank N. Dost, D.J. Atkinson and Peter Morris. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal for the History of Science, History of Science, Ambix, Geographical Journal and Medical History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact