Paul Teller

75 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Paul Teller
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • History and Philosophy of Science 1.2k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 525
  • Philosophy 451
  • Theoretical Computer Science 44
  • General Decision Sciences 46
Replace Lawrence Sklar with:
Lawrence Sklar United States
Craig Callender United States
Huw Price Australia
Roman Frigg United Kingdom
Michael Redhead United Kingdom
Brian Ellis Australia
Tim Maudlin United States
William Demopoulos Canada
Stephan Hartmann Germany
Barry Loewer United States
Paul Teller relative to Lawrence Sklar United States Lawrence Sklar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Lawrence Sklar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Teller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Teller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Teller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Teller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Teller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Teller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Teller. The network helps show where Paul Teller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Paul Teller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Teller Line = papers co-authored together Paul Teller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973245
2 2001207
3 1986185
4 1995112
5 1990106
6 199298
7 197385
8 199466
9 199160
10 197659
11 197252
12 199940
13 200436
14 198436
15 200235
16 199235
17 200134
18 198034
19 198332
20 199131

About Paul Teller

Paul Teller is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (30 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (22 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (6 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (4 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (3 papers) and Science and Climate Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (1.2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (525 citations), Philosophy (451 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (44 citations) and General Decision Sciences (46 citations). Paul Teller has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Redhead, Eugen Merzbacher, Richard W. Miller, Peter Achinstein, Arthur Fine, Bas C. van Fraassen, Joseph Rouse, Deborah G. Mayo, Nancy Cartwright and Ronald N. Giere. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, The Philosophical Review, Synthese, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact