International Studies in the Philosophy of Science

9.1k citations
714 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science

568 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Peers

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
  • History and Philosophy of Science 4.3k
  • Theoretical Computer Science 183
  • Philosophy 1.6k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
  • General Psychology 89
Replace Journal for General Philosophy of Science with:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Germany
European Journal for Philosophy of Science United States
Perspectives on Science United States
Foundations of Science United States
dialectica United States
Science in Context United States
Minds and Machines United States
American Philosophical Quarterly United States
Midwest Studies in Philosophy United States
Philosophical Topics United States
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science relative to Journal for General Philosophy of Science Germany Journal for General Philosophy of Science's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Journal for General Philosophy of Science · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Studies in the Philosophy of Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science.

About International Studies in the Philosophy of Science

The 714 papers published in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science in the last decades have received a total of 9.1k indexed citations . Papers published in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (455 papers), Theoretical Computer Science (19 papers), Philosophy (142 papers), General Psychology (12 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (94 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and History of Science (414 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (106 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (85 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (82 papers), Science and Climate Studies (74 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (54 papers), History of Science and Medicine (39 papers) and Relativity and Gravitational Theory (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science are Deborah G. Mayo, Victor Gijsbers, Mauricio Suárez, Jon Williamson, Federica Russo, John Earman, Peter Machamer, Daniela M. Bailer‐Jones, Lev Vaidman and Michela Massimi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact