Peter J. Knott

3.2k citations
51 papers · 2.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Peter J. Knott

51 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Peter J. Knott
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Biological Psychiatry 413
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 276
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 461
  • Physiology 627
Replace Philip A. Berger with:
Philip A. Berger United States
Jerzy Vetulani Poland
Farouk Karoum United States
Edna K. Gordon United States
Paul Moser France
Violetta Klimek Poland
F Fadda Italy
Sharon C. Cheetham United Kingdom
D.F. Sharman Slovakia
Yutaka Gomita Japan
Peter J. Knott relative to Philip A. Berger United States Philip A. Berger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Philip A. Berger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Knott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Knott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Knott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Knott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Knott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Knott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Knott. The network helps show where Peter J. Knott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Knott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Knott Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Knott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995494
2 1972309
3 1972270
4 1973186
5 1974123
6 2008112
7 1988108
8 199290
9 197486
10 198775
11 199657
12 198554
13 199746
14 197146
15 199541
16 197538
17
Effects of mesocortical dopaminergic lesions upon subcortical dopaminergic function.
198838
18 197536
19 198135
20 197635

About Peter J. Knott

Peter J. Knott is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (8 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (6 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (413 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (276 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (461 citations) and Physiology (627 citations). Peter J. Knott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include G. Curzon, M. H. Joseph, Vahram Haroutunian, Kenneth L. Davis, Linda M. Bierer, Dushyant P. Purohit, James Schmeidler, Daniel P. Perl, Philip D. Kanof and T. Brannan. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Neurochemistry, Nature, Psychiatry Research and Biochemical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact