Peter J. Bates

1.4k citations
58 papers · 891 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter J. Bates

47 papers receiving 806 citations

Peers

Peter J. Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • General Health Professions 354
  • Occupational Therapy 28
  • Safety Research 56
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 47
  • Clinical Psychology 124
Replace Elizabeth Bronwen Knight with:
Elizabeth Bronwen Knight Australia
Charles C. Calderwood United States
Michalis Galanakis Greece
Glenda Anne Cook United Kingdom
Andrea E. Lamont United States
Andrei Rusu Romania
Jean McKendree United Kingdom
Christine Gustafsson Sweden
Lynn Curry Canada
Vítor Manuel Costa Pereira Rodrigues Portugal
Peter J. Bates relative to Elizabeth Bronwen Knight Australia Elizabeth Bronwen Knight's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.6×
Elizabeth Bronwen Knight · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Bates. The network helps show where Peter J. Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Bates Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004127
2 2018123
3 201875
4 200364
5 199364
6 201862
7 202456
8 201852
9 201734
10 200224
11 200819
12 202218
13 200318
14 202014
15 199213
16 200111
17
Working for inclusion : making social inclusion a reality for people with severe mental health problems
200210
18
Touring Machine: a software platform for distributed multimedia applications
199210
19 201610
20 20257

About Peter J. Bates

Peter J. Bates is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Demography, Education and Health, having authored 58 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (11 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (3 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (2 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (354 citations), Occupational Therapy (28 citations), Safety Research (56 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (47 citations) and Clinical Psychology (124 citations). Peter J. Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mike Slade, Rebecca Toney, Helen Hall Jennings, Marc Cowling, Nigel Meager, Sara Meddings, Kristian Pollock, Claire Henderson, Anna Taylor and Justin J. Waring. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Adult Protection, BMC Psychiatry, BMJ Open, Communications of the ACM and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact