Peter H. Schmidt

51 papers receiving 700 citations

Peers

Peter H. Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Toxicology 264
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 98
  • Emergency Medicine 112
  • Pharmacology 181
  • Ophthalmology 59
Replace Samuel J. Stellpflug with:
Samuel J. Stellpflug United States
Émilie Jouanjus France
Trond Oskar Aamo Norway
James J. Kuhlman United States
Anni Steentoft Denmark
Robert O. Bost United States
Nicolas Franchitto France
Marianne Arnestad Norway
Alison M. Dines United Kingdom
Jane M. Prosser United States
Peter H. Schmidt relative to Samuel J. Stellpflug United States Samuel J. Stellpflug's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Samuel J. Stellpflug · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter H. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter H. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter H. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter H. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter H. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter H. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter H. Schmidt. The network helps show where Peter H. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter H. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter H. Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Peter H. Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008122
2 201297
3
A fatal case involving several synthetic cannabinoids
201339
4 200438
5 201435
6 201634
7 201426
8 201626
9 201523
10 201921
11 200520
12 201617
13 201914
14 200514
15 202013
16 202013
17 202012
18 200811
19 201611
20 201810

About Peter H. Schmidt

Peter H. Schmidt is a scholar working on Toxicology, Pharmacology, Emergency Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 54 papers that have together received 723 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (26 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (17 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (12 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (9 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (5 papers) and Poisoning and overdose treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (264 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (98 citations), Emergency Medicine (112 citations), Pharmacology (181 citations) and Ophthalmology (59 citations). Peter H. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Mattias Kettner, Nadine Schaefer, Jörn Lötsch, B. Oertel, Stephan A. Padosch, Hans H. Maurer, Matthias W. Laschke, Michael D. Menger, Andreas H. Ewald and Burkhard Madea. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International, Archives of Toxicology, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Drug Testing and Analysis and International Journal of Legal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact