Cora Wunder

51 papers receiving 936 citations

Cora Wunder's Hit Papers

Resistant hypertension? Assessment of adherence by toxicological urine analysis 2013 · 343 citations
3430+4+8Years since publication100200300

Peers

Cora Wunder
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Family Practice 107
  • Toxicology 187
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 288
  • Pharmacology 146
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 28
Replace Andreas G. Helfer with:
Andreas G. Helfer Germany
Şule Oktay Türkiye
Randall L. Tackett United States
Young Hee Kim South Korea
Gerold F. Kauert Germany
Julian A. Michely Germany
Jens Schou Denmark
Hartmud Neurath Germany
Kenneth E. Ferslew United States
Lisa A Boothby United States
Cora Wunder relative to Andreas G. Helfer Germany Andreas G. Helfer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Andreas G. Helfer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cora Wunder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cora Wunder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cora Wunder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cora Wunder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cora Wunder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cora Wunder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cora Wunder. The network helps show where Cora Wunder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cora Wunder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cora Wunder Line = papers co-authored together Cora Wunder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Resistant hypertension? Assessment of adherence by toxicological urine analysis
Hit paper breakdown →
2013343
2 201753
3 201433
4 201726
5 201425
6 201324
7 200921
8 201021
9 201120
10 201419
11 201918
12 202218
13 201618
14 201618
15 201317
16 201717
17 201017
18 201316
19 201716
20 201515

About Cora Wunder

Cora Wunder is a scholar working on Toxicology, Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Insect Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 984 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (17 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (11 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (10 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (4 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (107 citations), Toxicology (187 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (288 citations), Pharmacology (146 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (28 citations). Cora Wunder has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Stefan W. Toennes, Alexander Paulke, Oliver Jung, Helmut Geiger, Werner Pogoda, Dietrich Mebs, Johannes G. Ramaekers, Eef L. Theunissen, Gerold F. Kauert and Manfred Schubert‐Zsilavecz. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International, Toxicon, Drug Testing and Analysis, International Journal of Legal Medicine and Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact