Peter G. Smith

15.5k citations
249 papers · 7.9k · h-index 47

Impact in

Papers in

Peter G. Smith

243 papers receiving 7.7k citations

Peers

Peter G. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
  • Reproductive Medicine 493
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 376
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 928
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 142
  • Molecular Biology 2.8k
Replace Yuko Sato with:
Yuko Sato Japan
Niels Marcussen Denmark
S M Hsu United States
Michael Emerson United Kingdom
Hiroyuki Sasaki Japan
Ho Jae Han South Korea
Flemming Brandt Sørensen Denmark
Takashi Tanaka Japan
Toshihiko Iwanaga Japan
Johannes P.T.M. van Leeuwen Netherlands
Peter G. Smith relative to Yuko Sato Japan Yuko Sato's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Yuko Sato · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter G. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter G. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter G. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter G. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter G. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter G. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter G. Smith. The network helps show where Peter G. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter G. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter G. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Peter G. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 249 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000470
2 2016266
3 2010239
4 2010221
5 2002190
6 2010186
7 2009184
8 2013150
9 2004150
10 2011137
11 2011130
12 2004127
13 2006112
14 2011111
15 199395
16 200392
17 201390
18 200490
19 197388
20
Field trials of health interventions in developing countries : a toolbox
199686

About Peter G. Smith

Peter G. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Physiology and Immunology, having authored 249 papers that have together received 7.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (30 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (25 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (20 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (17 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (15 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (13 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (12 papers) and Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (493 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (376 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (928 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (142 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.8k citations). Peter G. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Elena V. Zoubina, E. N. Clare Mills, Michael A. Milhollen, Wohaib Hasan, Dora Krizsan‐Agbas, Teresa A. Soucy, Jena J. Steinle, Usha Narayanan, Mark Rolfe and Manxi Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, Blood, Aquaculture, Autonomic Neuroscience and Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact