Peter Eames

655 citations
20 papers · 450 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Traumatic Brain Injury Research 10
    • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 6
    • Neurology and Historical Studies 2

Peter Eames

19 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

Peter Eames
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Emergency Medicine 98
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 121
  • Neurology 100
  • Epidemiology 218
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 14
Replace David J. Fordyce with:
David J. Fordyce United States
Kevin W. Walsh Australia
Randall W. Evans United States
B. N. Axelrod United States
Dan Hoofien Israel
Sarah M. Jurick United States
Janet P. Niemeier United States
Tresa M. Roebuck United States
Clare Morey United States
Vincent M. OʼDonnell United States
Peter Eames relative to David J. Fordyce United States David J. Fordyce's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David J. Fordyce · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Eames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Eames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Eames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Eames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Eames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Eames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Eames. The network helps show where Peter Eames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Peter Eames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Eames Line = papers co-authored together Peter Eames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1985108
2 199664
3 197856
4 199240
5 198539
6 200335
7 200522
8 198819
9 199516
10
Models of Brain Injury Rehabilitation
198813
11 199311
12 19976
13 19995
14 19994
15 19913
16
The use of P300 as a mental chronometer in closed head injury patients.
19963
17 19873
18 19882
19 19861
20 19990

About Peter Eames

Peter Eames is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Neurology, Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Surgery, having authored 20 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (10 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (6 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (98 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (121 citations), Neurology (100 citations), Epidemiology (218 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations). Peter Eames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rodger Wood, J.P.A. Lodge, Peter Larsen, D. C. Galletly, Stephen Logsdail, Jonathan M. Bird, Daniel Rogers, Eleanor Leigh, Simon Fleminger and Rodger Ll. Wood. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Clinical Rehabilitation, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation and Current Opinion in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact