Peter Eames

25 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

Peter Eames
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Emergency Medicine 115
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 157
  • Neurology 135
  • Epidemiology 255
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 18
Replace David J. Fordyce with:
David J. Fordyce United States
Randall W. Evans United States
Kevin W. Walsh Australia
Dan Hoofien Israel
Patricia M. Arenth United States
James Duffy United States
B. N. Axelrod United States
Sarah M. Jurick United States
Clare E. Morey United States
Nancy S. Hinkeldey United States
Peter Eames relative to David J. Fordyce United States David J. Fordyce's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
David J. Fordyce · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Eames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Eames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Eames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Eames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Eames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Eames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Eames. The network helps show where Peter Eames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Peter Eames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Eames Line = papers co-authored together Peter Eames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985124
2 199697
3 197874
4 199243
5 198541
6 200335
7 200522
8 198921
9 198820
10 199518
11 198916
12
Models of Brain Injury Rehabilitation
198813
13 199311
14 199710
15 19996
16 19905
17 19995
18 20174
19
The use of P300 as a mental chronometer in closed head injury patients.
19963
20 19873

About Peter Eames

Peter Eames is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (13 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (7 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (6 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers) and Neurology and Historical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (115 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (157 citations), Neurology (135 citations), Epidemiology (255 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (18 citations). Peter Eames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rodger Wood, J.P.A. Lodge, Duncan C. Galletly, Peter Larsen, Eleanor Leigh, Daniel Rogers, Jonathan Michael Bird, Stephen Logsdail, Simon Fleminger and Rodger Ll. Wood. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, The Lancet, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Resuscitation and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact