Dan Hoofien

26 papers receiving 701 citations

Peers

Dan Hoofien
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Emergency Medicine 97
  • Epidemiology 311
  • Neurology 130
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 169
  • Applied Psychology 34
Replace Jeffrey Wertheimer with:
Jeffrey Wertheimer United States
Clare Morey United States
Randall W. Evans United States
Patricia M. Arenth United States
Fiadhnait O’Keeffe Ireland
Carrie Esopenko United States
L Rabin United States
Kristy Draper Australia
Margaret A. Struchen United States
L. L. Stethem Canada
Dan Hoofien relative to Jeffrey Wertheimer United States Jeffrey Wertheimer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Jeffrey Wertheimer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Hoofien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Hoofien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Hoofien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Hoofien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Hoofien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Hoofien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Hoofien. The network helps show where Dan Hoofien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Hoofien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Hoofien Line = papers co-authored together Dan Hoofien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013141
2 201090
3 200276
4 200969
5 200457
6 201448
7 199141
8 201133
9 199333
10 202014
11 200514
12 201712
13 201212
14
Measuring unawareness of deficits among patients with traumatic brain injury: reliability and validity of the Patient Competency Rating Scale--Hebrew version.
200612
15 199211
16 20088
17 20168
18 19928
19 20137
20 20007

About Dan Hoofien

Dan Hoofien is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Neurology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 28 papers that have together received 723 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (14 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (6 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (97 citations), Epidemiology (311 citations), Neurology (130 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (169 citations) and Applied Psychology (34 citations). Dan Hoofien has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Eli Vakil, Ohr Barak, Asaf Gilboa, Haya Blachstein, Olga Volkov, Yair Bechor, Eshel Ben‐Jacob, Shai Efrati, Haim Golan and Fani Andelman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Neuropsychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, European Journal of Psychological Assessment and Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact