Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

1.5k papers and 38.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation in the last decades have received a total of 38.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation usually cover Epidemiology (636 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (615 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (455 papers) specifically the topics of Traumatic Brain Injury Research (580 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (227 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (218 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation are Barbara A. Wilson, Robyn Tate, Walter Paulus, Jennie Ponsford, Jonathan J. Evans, Nick Alderman, Linda Clare, Vicki Anderson, Skye McDonald and Tamara Ownsworth.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.

Countries where authors publish in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neuropsychological Rehabilitation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025